Option D is the correct answer.
The passage mentions that 66% of coyote attacks involve a dog, which can either provoke a carnivore or
escalate a dangerous situation when the dog chases a carnivore or vice versa. In areas with large carnivores,
unleashing dogs can increase the likelihood of encounters and conflicts. Therefore, option D is the most likely
scenario to exacerbate carnivore-human conflicts.
Why the other options are less likely to exacerbate the conflicts:
Option A: Preventing wild animals from being attracted to human food sources would actually reduce carnivorehuman conflicts by keeping animals from becoming habituated to humans. This would prevent potential issues,

Option B: The passage suggests that climate change could increase the frequency of human-carnivore
encounters due to scarcity of resources. Therefore, addressing climate change would likely help prevent the
issue rather than exacerbate it.
Option C: According to the passage, photographing wild animals in secured viewing areas is not a major driver
of carnivore-human conflicts. Conflicts typically arise from behaviours that encourage animals to approach
humans or interact in risky ways, not from observation in protected zones. Therefore, this is unlikely to
exacerbate conflicts.