"Through meditation and the right attitude, one allows emotions to happen to oneself (it is impossible to prevent this), but one is advised to observe the emotions without necessarily acting on them; one achieves some distance and decides what has value and what does not have value." In the context of the passage, which one of the following is not a possible implication of the quoted statement?
Started 2 months ago by Shashank in
Explanatory Answer
The given line does not imply that meditation allows 'out-of-body' experiences.
On the other hand, it says that by distancing from emotions one can decide what has value and what does not have value. So, option B is implied.
The passage also says that second movement is what one does next about the emotion. So, option C is implied.
The given line also says that through meditation and the right attitude, one allows emotions to happen to oneself but can observe these emotions without acting on them. That is, one can passively receive experiences. So, option D is implied.
-
No one is replied to this question yet. Be first to reply!