The question asks us to identify the hypothetical scenario that does not reflect the kind of loss described in the
passage. The passage discusses cultural, ecological, and intellectual losses caused by language extinction,
including the loss of:
Unique cultural expressions (e.g., music, art, and emotions tied to language).
Knowledge about the environment (e.g., relationships between plants and illness).
Worldviews and philosophical insights.
We need to identify a scenario that doesn’t align with these themes. Let us examine the options based on this
understanding -
Option A: This scenario reflects the loss of unique cultural knowledge - in this case, the ability to describe the
“20 different moods of the ocean,” which likely represents detailed ecological and environmental
understanding.
Option B: This scenario focuses on some form of administrative or statistical change in a government list; the
focus is not on the cultural, ecological, or intellectual loss emphasised in the passage. Therefore, the option
does not reflect the deeper, humanity-wide loss described in the passage.
Option C: This scenario aligns with the loss of unique cultural concepts and the emotional depth tied to a word
or phrase. In the author’s perspective, losing this concept would diminish humanity's understanding of the
complexity of human relationships.
Option D: This scenario reflects the loss of ecological knowledge about snow textures, which likely has
practical implications for living in the Arctic environment. This aligns with the passage's discussion of losing
environmental wisdom when languages die.
Hence, Option B is the correct choice