Live Updates
• CATKing has launched new chat bot.

• New video on Logs has been released.
13.2K
Learners
asked the doubt

Previous Year Questions
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the best answer for
each question.
Languages become endangered and die out for many reasons. Sadly, the physical annihilation of communities
of native speakers of a language is all too often the cause of language extinction. In North America, European
colonists brought death and destruction to many Native American communities. This was followed by US
federal policies restricting the use of indigenous languages, including the removal of native children from their
communities to federal boarding schools where native languages and cultural practices were prohibited. As
many as 75 percent of the languages spoken in the territories that became the United States have gone extinct,
with slightly better language survival rates in Central and South America ...
Even without physical annihilation and prohibitions against language use, the language of the "dominant"
cultures may drive other languages into extinction; young people see education, jobs, culture and technology
associated with the dominant language and focus their attention on that language. The largest language
"killers" are English, Spanish, Portuguese, French, Russian, Hindi, and Chinese, all of which have privileged
status as dominant languages threatening minority languages.
When we lose a language, we lose the worldview, culture and knowledge of the people who spoke it,
constituting a loss to all humanity. People around the world live in direct contact with their native environment,
their habitat. When the language they speak goes extinct, the rest of humanity loses their knowledge of that
environment, their wisdom about the relationship between local plants and illness, their philosophical and
religious beliefs, as well as their native cultural expression (in music, visual art and poetry) that has enriched
both the speakers of that language and others who would have encountered that culture ...
As educators deeply immersed in the liberal arts, we believe that educating students broadly in all facets of
language and culture ... yields immense rewards. Some individuals educated in the liberal arts tradition will
pursue advanced study in linguistics and become actively engaged in language preservation, setting out for the
Amazon, for example, with video recording equipment to interview the last surviving elders in a community to
record and document a language spoken by no children.
Certainly, though, the vast majority of students will not pursue this kind of activity. For these students, a liberal
arts education is absolutely critical from the twin perspectives of language extinction and global citizenship.
When students study languages other than their own, they are sensitized to the existence of different cultural
perspectives and practices. With such an education, students are more likely to be able to articulate insights
into their own cultural biases, be more empathetic to individuals of other cultures, communicate successfully
across linguistic and cultural differences, consider and resolve questions in a way that reflects multiple cultural
perspectives, and, ultimately extend support to people, programs, practices, and policies that support the
preservation of endangered languages.
There is ample evidence that such preservation can work in languages spiraling toward extinction. For example,
Navajo, Cree, and Inuit communities have established schools in which these languages are the language of
instruction, and the number of speakers of each has increased.
In the context of the passage, which one of the following hypothetical scenarios, if true, is NOT an example
of the kind of loss that occurs when a language becomes extinct?
Video Explanation

Which one of the following hypothetical scenarios, if true, would most strongly undermine the central ideas
of the passage?
Video Explanation

It can be inferred from the passage that it is likely South America had a slightly better language survival rate
than North America for all of the following reasons EXCEPT:
Video Explanation

The author believes that a liberal arts education combined with participation in language preservation
empower students in all of the following ways EXCEPT that they will
Video Explanation

The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the best answer for
each question.
Moutai has been the global booze sensation of the decade. A bottle of its Flying Fairy, which sold in the 1980s
for the equivalent of a dollar, now retails for $400. Moutai’s listed shares have soared by almost 600% in the
past five years, outpacing the likes of Amazon ...
It does this while disregarding every Western marketing mantra. It is not global, has meagre digital sales and
does not appeal to millennials. It scores pitifully on environmental, social and government measures. In the Boy
Scout world of Western business, it would leave a bad taste in more ways than one.
Moutai owes its intoxicating success to three factors—not all of them easy to emulate. First, it profits from
Chinese nationalism. Moutai is known as the “national liquor”. It was used to raise spirits and disinfect wounds
in Mao’s Long March. It was Premier Zhou Enlai’s favourite tipple, shared with Richard Nixon in 1972. Its
centuries-old craftsmanship—it is distilled eight times and stored for years in earthenware jars—is a source of
national pride. It also claims to be hangover-proof, which would make it an invention to rival gunpowder ...
Second, it chose to serve China’s super-rich rather than its middle class. Markets are littered with the corpses of
firms that could not compete in the cut-throat battle for Chinese middle-class wallets. And the country’s
premium market is massive—at 73m-strong, bigger than the population of France, notes Euan McLeish of
Bernstein, an investment firm, and still less crowded with prestige brands than advanced economies. Moutai is
to these well-heeled drinkers what vintage champagne is to the rest of the world ...
Third, Moutai looks beyond affluent millennials and digital natives. The elderly and the middle-aged, it found,
can be just as lucrative. Its biggest market now is (male) drinkers in their mid-30s. Many have no siblings,
thanks to four decades of China’s one-child policy—which also means their elderly parents can splash out on
weddings and banquets. Moutai is often a guest of honour.
Moutai has succeeded thanks to nationalism, elitism and ageism, in other words—not in spite of this unholy
trinity. But it faces risks. The government is its largest shareholder—and a meddlesome one. It appears to want
prices to remain stable. Exorbitantly priced booze is at odds with its professed socialist ideals. Yet minority
investors—including many foreign funds—lament that Moutai’s wholesale price is a third of what it sells for in
shops. Raising it could boost the company’s profits further. Instead, in what some see as a travesty of
corporate governance, its majority owner has plans to set up its own sales channel ...
In the long run, its biggest risk may be millennials. As they grow older, health concerns, work-life balance and
the desire for more wholesome pursuits than binge-drinking may curb the“Ganbei!” toasting culture [heavy
drinking] on which so much of the demand for Moutai rests. For the time being, though, the party goes on.
The phrase “would make it an invention to rival gunpowder” has been used in the passage in a sense that is
Video Explanation

Which one of the following is both a reason for Moutai’s success as well as a possible threat to that
success?
Video Explanation

In the context of the passage, it is most likely that the author refers to Moutai’s marketing strategy as “the
unholy trinity” because
Video Explanation

In the context of the passage, we can infer that to succeed in the liquor industry in China, a marketing firm
must consider all of the following factors affecting the Chinese liquor market EXCEPT that
Video Explanation

The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the best answer for
each question.
Fears of artificial intelligence (AI) have haunted humanity since the very beginning of the computer age.
Hitherto, these fears focused on machines using physical means to kill, enslave or replace people. But over the
past couple of years, new AI tools have emerged that threaten the survival of human civilisation from an
unexpected direction. AI has gained some remarkable abilities to manipulate and generate language, whether
with words, sounds or images. AI has thereby hacked the operating system of our civilisation.
Language is the stuff almost all human culture is made of. Human rights, for example, aren’t inscribed in our
DNA. Rather, they are cultural artefacts we created by telling stories and writing laws. Gods aren’t physical
realities. Rather, they are cultural artefacts we created by inventing myths and writing scriptures….What would
happen once a non-human intelligence becomes better than the average human at telling stories, composing
melodies, drawing images, and writing laws and scriptures? When people think about Chatgpt and other new AI
tools, they are often drawn to examples like schoolchildren using AI to write their essays. What will happen to
the school system when kids do that? But this kind of question misses the big picture. Forget about school
essays. Think of the next American presidential race in 2024, and try to imagine the impact of AI tools that can
be made to mass-produce political content, fake news stories and scriptures for new cults…
Through its mastery of language, AI could even form intimate relationships with people, and use the power of
intimacy to change our opinions and worldviews. Although there is no indication that AI has any consciousness
or feelings of its own, to foster fake intimacy with humans, it is enough if the AI can make them feel emotionally
attached to it….
What will happen to the course of history when AI takes over culture, and begins producing stories, melodies,
laws and religions? Previous tools like the printing press and radio helped spread the cultural ideas of humans,
but they never created new cultural ideas of their own. AI is fundamentally different. AI can create completely
new ideas, completely new culture….Of course, the new power of AI could be used for good purposes as well. I
won’t dwell on this because the people who develop AI talk about it enough….
We can still regulate the new AI tools, but we must act quickly. Whereas nukes cannot invent more powerful
nukes, AI can make exponentially more powerful AI.… Unregulated AI deployments would create social chaos,
which would benefit autocrats and ruin democracies. Democracy is a conversation, and conversations rely on
language. When AI hacks language, it could destroy our ability to have meaningful conversations, thereby
destroying democracy …. And the first regulation I would suggest is to make it mandatory for AI to disclose that
it is an AI. If I am having a conversation with someone, and I cannot tell whether it is a human or an AI—that’s
the end of democracy. This text has been generated by a human. Or has it?
The author identifies all of the following as dire outcomes of the capture of language by AI EXCEPT that it
could
Video Explanation

The author terms language “the operating system of our civilization” for all the following reasons EXCEPT
that it
Video Explanation

We can infer that the author is most likely to agree with which of the following statements?
Video Explanation

The tone of the passage could best be described as
Video Explanation

Previous year papers
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018