A fundamental conclusion by the author is that:
Started 4 months ago by Shashank in
Explanatory Answer
Refer to the last line: "The combination of rapid population growth with the diversity of those moving into the cities created what the Chicago School sociologists called social disorganization". Rapid or dramatic social change, according to the passage, causes increases in crime. So, a fundamental conclusion by the author is that rapid population growth and demographic diversity give rise to social disorganisation that can feed the growth of crime.
Option A blames racial disparities for the flourishing of crime. This is incorrect. The passage only says that where there is massive migration of people of different races into cities without social integration, crime flourishes.
Option B is the opposite of what the passage says.
Option C is incorrect. The passage does not say that according to European sociologists, crime in America is mainly in Chicago.
-
No one is replied to this question yet. Be first to reply!
